The Trifle Difference Between Obama & Hillary

Nobody’s Opinion: On the news this morning, the talk is about “race.” Specifically the fight between Hillary Clinton, who basically said the reason the blacks had come so far was because our government let them; and Obama, who said the reason blacks had come so far was because of courageous individuals leading the way.

Hillary was reminding us in her manipulatative way, that only the state can rule our lives; Obama was making the statement that it’s up to individuals to make the changes.

If we follow the logic in Hillary’s world, the King of England gave us our country’s independence in 1776, and our founders were just happy to receive it.

In Hillary’s world, the government grants you the right. In Obama’s world, the individual makes his rights.

Subliminally, Hillary keeps telling us she will take care of us, our children, and our little dogs too---right down to the very essence of our choice of internet sites.

Obama was smart enough to give the “right” answer, even though he himself believes in the same socialist big government that Hillary does.

I don’t trust either one of them, but there is a difference.

I remember once reading an autobiography on Arthur Rubenstein, the great pianist, because I especially loved his rendition of Beethoven’s Moonlight Sonata more than any other that I had heard. Why I wondered--- why was his version so much more poignant?

He said that every time he played a piece of music, everything that had happened to him up to that point in life, went into the way he played the piece. Every word, every pain, every loss, every gain…every moment in his life went into his interpretation. I thought that insight from Mr. Rubenstein rather profound, and a good thing to remember. I especially remind myself of it whenever I talk to my very liberal neighbor who works for our local fascist school system.

It keeps me from telling her that not only is she an idiot, she’s blind. I remind myself that the last time she read anything that was conservative or even talked to one, was probably in a nightmare.

All of us, no matter man or woman, liberal or conservatives, Muslim or Christian, interpret life according to what has happened to our life up to that point.

Genetics plays at least half a factor in this, but the other half gets filled up with the people and events which shape our opinions about nearly everything, and that’s my point here.

The Bible got it pretty close, clay makes good molding.

Clarence Thomas just wrote a book excellent book about this subject.

In other words, whatever the subject, be it race, gender, divorce, vegetables, how to pick a course for a nation; that person will use his experience up to that point in time to decide on a course.

And it would be wise for the rest of us, and the sake of our children, to decide how these two candidates came to be who they are.

Hillary we are told, had a domineering Republican father, and like many of her peers who grew up in the sixties, she rebelled against him completely. She became a full-fledged Marxist with a lot of help.

Let’s face it; the course that she took was a very logical one for her. Not exactly a beauty, she knew she had brains, and wanted to change the world for all women like her…she bought into the whole feminist bag.

Along came Bill Clinton, Nelson Rockefeller, and the rest was history.

Hillary’s price for her suffering with Bill’s sex addiction, was that he would get her elected some day as first woman President.

Her whole life has been focused on this one objective, which she has convinced herself is the right one for the planet---her need for her own affirmation is that great.

Obama’s past on the other hand, is much more connected to his race. Even though he was hardly ever around his black Muslim father, and went to the best schools where whites were most prominent…and even though Obama’s mother is white, he still looks black, therefore, he is black.

In our politically correct society, this new mix of one parent being white, and one parent being black--- the child, if his skin is colored, is called black. If his skin is lighter, he is called a mulatto.

By the dictionary terms, even a dark-skinned child of a white & black first generation parents should be called a mulatto, but that word doesn’t get you votes.

And being black at this point in time, has huge benefits in the political correction arena of running against the first woman for President.

Obama has seen the poverty of Chicago. He has seen the black poverty of Africa. He copies the message of Martin Luther King who wanted a world with no classes, no racial divides, and all men brothers.

He preaches that it’s the individual that will rise to save a nation. That’s why many whites prefer him over Hillary.

It has a strong calling to Independents and Conservatives who believe that truth---our founders lived it.

But will Obama unit the American Nation like he says? Or will he become President and then spend all his time trying to save the poor blacks in Africa, with Oprah at his side?

His speeches from the past suggest exactly that.

So, which one would you choose? Hillary, the divide and conqueror---or Obama, the savior of Africa?

As Americans, based on our constitution, our choice should be “neither.”