Dear Mr. Cameron---You're a little late, don't ya think?

Nobody Gets Email on Saturday Night:

Last week this came to me, pretty much while Cairo was burning. This week, the news is on our own country's problems. But it seems, we are NOW finding out, that Obama and his many arms of "community servicers" were behind the middle East AND the union strikes in Wisconsin.

It's a letter to Prime Minister David Cameron, and I included the full text here. It's a bit long, but it's pretty good.(Thanks to amfortas)

*****

Dear Mr Cameron

I am writing to you in connection with the speech you delivered at the Munich Security Conference last week since its subject matter pertains not just to the security of the United Kingdom and other Western European states but also to the long-term survival of the indigenous population of this country itself: the ultimate security question.

You begin your speech by seeking to reassure fellow member NATO states that despite the dire condition of the UK economy Britain will continue to meet the NATO 2% defence-spending target. In general terms that is good. However, the standard government line notwithstanding – Labour as well as Tory – Britain is not made safer nor is our national security enhanced by the presence of NATO troops in Afghanistan. The NATO presence in Afghanistan has, I believe, more to do with the nuclear ambitions of Iran.

Now, you begin your discussion of the terrorist threat in the UK by saying that some of these attacks are carried out ‘by our own citizens’ and that the perpetrators, Muslims, ‘are prepared to blow themselves up and kill their fellow citizens’ (my emphasis).

But these Muslim terrorists do not regard me, us, as ‘their fellow citizens’. Indeed, they are correct: I am not one of ‘their fellow citizens’. Nor do I wish to be. Formally these people may have acquired a British passport but in what way can these people be regarded as ‘our own citizens’ when they live in parallel societies paid for by the white indigenous population and are at best indifferent to, and at worst murderously hostile, to the interests of the host indigenous population? If I went to live in Munich and started to make demands of indigenous Germans that they adapt to my folkways, habits and customs and threatened to kill them, would Germans regard me as one of their own? I doubt it.

True, Europe has suffered from terrorism before the arrival of Al Qaeda and its imitators. The key difference is however that groups such as The Angry Brigade (England) IRA (Northern Ireland), The Red Brigades (Italy), Direct Action (France) and Baader-Meinhof & RAF (West Germany) were all home-grown groups. People who were active in the IRA belong to the tribes of the British Isles.

Muslims have no such claim. They are alien. Islamic terrorism would not be a problem in the United Kingdom had we maintained strict control over our borders and not permitted the huge influx of immigrants from Pakistan, Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, Turkey and Somalia. This was and remains a direct consequence of the cult of multiculturalism, a cult that preaches the poisonous view that, for example, sub-Saharan Africans have as much right to live in Britain as the white indigenous population.

You say that: ‘Europe needs to wake up to what is happening in our own countries’. Who exactly needs to wake up? Millions of people throughout Europe who over the last 40 years have seen their cities turned into Third World slums, who have witnessed, and suffered from, the relentless influx of immigrants, Muslim or otherwise, who have seen their institutions – police, armed forces, health services – corrupted by multiculturalism, who have seen their primary and secondary schools and universities turned into centres of politically correct indoctrination, where to be white, middle class, heterosexual and Christian is to suffer a constant stream of insults and barely concealed hatred, where, on the other hand, to be black or non-white is to enjoy special, protected-species status since non-whites are supposed to be bearers of some wonderful gift (referred to as diversity) and a source of great wisdom. Those of us all over Europe need no lectures from you Mr Cameron on what has been happening.

If they are not exceptionally wealthy and have no choice but to endure the daily grind of commuting into our large cities or may actually have to live there, white people are confronted every day of their lives with the consequences of ‘vibrant multicultural diversity’ and have been for a long time. Take it from me they hate it and where possible they will avoid it all costs (white flight). If they work in the public sector and have large mortgages they will endure the consequences of the cult in silence, confiding their fears only to a trusted few.

All over Europe an unaccountable class of political-functionaries has sought to impose the alien cult of multiculturalism on the white indigenous populations. Your call that we need to stand up to Muslims - and it is not just Muslims – comes far too late and is, in any case, thoroughly dishonest. The danger to the white indigenous population posed by mass non-white immigration has been evident for a long time and politicians of all parties have either encouraged this process of dispossession or have been too cowardly to speak out in public. When, in his famous speech, Enoch Powell warned of what was to come he was mocked, derided and abandoned by people like you. The damage done to the indigenous population, its history, culture and future may now be irreversible. I pray to God that I am wrong; that it is not too late to save our nation.

Your attempts to distinguish between Islam as a religion of peace and Islamic terrorism are doomed to failure. Such is the overwhelming collectivist ethos of Islam and the complete absence of any respect for the dissenting individual that Muslims resident in this country who do not take part in acts of terrorism are not going to break ranks with the extremists. For Muslims the rule of law, free speech and liberal democracy are alien Western abstractions that mean very little. Given the choice between the rule of law, free speech and the civil society and Islam - in any shape or form - Muslims resident in this country will support the cause of Islam. There is no love for the British: we are just a source of welfare payments and material provision that would be impossible in Pakistan and Somalia (the reason immigrants come here).

You state the following: ‘It is vital that we make the distinction between religion on the one hand, and political ideology on the other. Time and again people equate the two’. Again, your attempt to separate religion from ideology is doomed to failure for the obvious reason that Islam, the ideology-religion, recognises no lay principle: it is all or nothing; it is Islam for the believers; Dhimmitude for the rest. Consequently, whatever action Western governments take to neutralise what they believe to be the purely political, ideological aspect of Islam, will always be interpreted as an attack on Islam as a whole. Indeed, such measures will be an attack on Islam as a whole since Islam does not recognise the division between state and civil society; the right of the individual to resist its collectivist ethos (just like communism incidentally).

The other factor that makes Islam a threat to the Christian West is the birth rate among Islamic immigrants resident in the West. The huge increase in the Muslim population throughout the West may well turn out to be the decisive factor that overwhelms the white indigenous population in their ancient lands, reducing them to a suppressed minority. In all the discussions about rising food prices, metals, access to water and productive farm land no one wishes to identify the real problem: specifically the reckless and unsustainable breeding of Third World Populations either in the Third World itself or in the Third World estates that Third-Worlders have been allowed to create in the First World.

You cite what has happened on the streets of Tunis and Cairo as an example of the compatibility of Western values and Islam: ‘hundreds of thousands of people demanding the universal right to free elections and democracy’. Middle-class, English-speaking protesters might well press the right buttons when interviewed by some BBC reporter but the underlying problem of Arab states and Sub-Saharan Africa is massive, out-of-control and unsustainable population growth. This is the Malthusian nightmare writ large and it is being played out all over the Third World. Egypt’s unemployed will remain unemployed (many of them are unemployable in any case). Hunger and hopelessness will gnaw at them. The results are predictable. Democracy and civil society are preposterous and irrelevant abstractions outside of Western Europe and will not feed people, certainly not in Egypt and Sub-Saharan Africa. Where populations spiral out of control, as they are doing in so many parts of the world, violence, exacerbated by religious/ideological fanaticism, is inevitable.

Concerning multiculturalism in the United Kingdom you state the following:

Under the doctrine of state multiculturalism, we have encouraged different cultures to live separate lives, apart from each other and apart from the mainstream. We’ve failed to provide a vision of society to which they feel they want to belong. We’ve even tolerated these segregated communities behaving in ways that run completely counter to our values.

For the avoidance of any doubt your repeated exculpatory use of “we” does not include me and, I suspect, millions of other Britons. Your use of ‘we’ refers to the last Labour government and the xenophiles who sought to impose the anti-white racist cult of multiculturalism on the indigenous population. It is emphatically not the responsibility of the indigenous population ‘to provide a vision of a society to which they [immigrants] feel they want to belong’. If, according to you, the ‘we’ failed to provide this vision, then why did millions of Islamic immigrants join the first wave who could not find this ‘vision’? If they have no ‘vision of society to which they feel they want to belong’ why do they stay?

Why not go home to Somalia, Waziristan and Sub-Saharan Africa? That these millions of immigrants have no ‘vision of society to which they feel they want to belong’ yet still stay in the Christian-infidel-infested wasteland of Britain suggests to me that their continued presence in Britain has everything to do with the fantastically generous welfare provision they receive (all the wives included) and absolutely nothing at all to do with any lack of ‘vision of society’.

You have been reported as saying that multiculturalism has failed. I see no clear statement of that in your speech at all. In fact, you claim that it is the indigenous population that has driven Muslims into their parallel societies. That you are still advocating some form of the cult is clear when you argue that ‘instead of encouraging people to live apart, we need a clear sense of shared national identity that is open to everyone’.

National identity by its very nature is exclusive, partial and narrow. A national identity that is ‘open to everyone’ is not a national identity. National identity is determined by a combination of genetic, racial, cultural, psychological, geographical, linguistic and mental factors, tempered by the blows of history, by shared suffering in war and peace, by humiliation and glory, by the memory of those gone before. How can my English national identity be open to everyone? The answer is that it cannot. National identity that is open to everyone ceases to be a national identity; national identity that is open to everyone is just another way of promoting multiculturalism without using the m-word. In other words, it is a deceit, a ploy to disarm the critics of multiculturalism who have instinctively and rationally apprehended the cult’s national-identity-hating agenda all along.

As an Englishman who still values his national identity I have no desire at all to share it with others. Do Pakistanis, Indians, Chinese, Japanese and Zulus want to share their national identity with me? Of course not: and why should they? It is their exclusive property.

Nor do immigrants wish to share their identity with white Europeans. When, in 2008, he addressed a large Turkish audience in Cologne, the Turkish Prime Minister, Reccep Erdogan was quite clear by what he understood on the question of integration. He told his audience: ‘I understand the sensitivity you show towards the question of assimilation. Nobody can expect that you tolerate assimilation. Nobody can expect that you submit yourself to assimilation. Then assimilation is a crime against humanity.’ Erdogan’s vision of how he expects Turks to behave in Europe is just one of a number of reasons why a Muslim non-European state such as Turkey can have no place at all in the EU.

You argue that Muslims are attracted to extremism from a sense of not belonging. Again you claim that this is the failure of ‘the wider society’. You might like to ask yourself why indigenous Britons - ‘the wider society’ - do not wish to engage with Muslims. Here are some of the reasons why indigenous, white Christian (or heathen) Britons want nothing to do with Islam:

Suicide-homicide bombers; sharia; jihad; the obscene practice of female circumcision; so-called honour killings; stoning women to death; polygamy, the sexual grooming of white girls; extreme censorship; hatred of free speech; welfare parasitism; mosques; continuing, active terroristic hatred of white European host societies; and the cruel murders of Christians in the Middle East (and Turkey).

I am not convinced that you are serious about combating the damage done by multiculturalism.

From Dr. Frank Ellis

Officials of the Westminster Dog Show: Please Update

I think dogs are the most amazing creatures; they give unconditional love. For me they are the role model for being alive. ~Gilda Radner

Nobody Cares that I'm a big dog fan...and therefore my problem: it seems my dogs are not normal. I have decided this after watching the Westminster Dog Show last week.
Dog lovers all over the country wait every year for it...the Westminster Dog Show in New York. We grab our popcorn, and aaah, and ooooh...and cuss out all the snobby looking judges who in our own mind, ALWAYS pick the ugliest one of the bunch. And this year was like all years before...it was really fun to watch.

"Wow...how long did THAT take to comb? Can you imagine the hair? "

And, "Why do they make all the big fat women wear dresses and RUN? Can't they let them have those leashes that stretch...give them time to catch up? "

And "Please...don't pick the poodle...don't pick the poodle...don't..don't..."

Was it me, or did the dogs get bigger this year? Some of them look like they could kill a small rhino. For that matter, some of the handlers look like they could take down a few crocs. For instance the all time winner, a Scottish Deerhound, is said to be able to hunt deer.

And therefore, my problem:

Every time a dog came up to the podium, an announcer would proclaim..."This dog was used by the---(fill in the blank)__________"Chinese, sailors, farmers, librarians, Genghis Khan, Queen of England, Duke of Burgundy, President of the Elk Club, Paris Hilton, Scotsman in kilts, women in heat...etc...to kill rats."

Every time I heard this...I was a amazed, because neither one of my dogs will kill my rapidly expanding population of rats in my backyard.

You see, I also love birds. And birdseed makes a big mess. And the rats always end up in my yard. Now most of my neighbors just call up the city, and they come and get rid of them for free...but I can't do that you see, because, I love my birds. And they would say--

"Lady, you need to stop feeding the birds."

Oh please...where's Al Gore when you need him?

Last fall, we had the cutest little rat. Really...I was growing fond of him...but now, that rat has grown, and the other night I looked out and counted...ten, big ones. The other nine were probably sleeping because they ate too much. I should put out little menu's for them to order from.

NOW...my dogs love the rats. They do not feel any inkling to catch them. I let them out and the stand over the rat hole and wag their tales, as if it's all a game.

"Hey guys...come out and play!"

Okay. Maybe it's my fault. When they were puppies they naturally came to me with dead birds in their mouths and I gently but firmly told them "NO...NO...we do NOT put dead anything in our mouths!"

It was very hard to do, because they come back to you so proudly with the expressing on their faces , "See...Aren't you proud of me? Look what I got! I'm a DOG Can I keep it? "

Yes...there I was chasing my American Eskimo all over the house saying, "PUT IT DOWN! Don't eat it!" A memory I could live without.

Ever since that lesson, they want to please me, so they do not go after my rats, the birds...only the squirrels and bunnies, which of course, they cannot catch.

Now--- according to the Westminster officials. The Pekinese...can get into the holes to chase the rats out. (Don't ask me how...the hair alone would scare them.)

Maybe I should get one of those.

And if you think this is just about dogs....I want to leave you with a final thought.Look at the diversity in the dog world. A Pekinese could NOT take down a deer.

No matter what you think of DNA...it's there. And it's sad that MUTTS are not included in the Westminster Show, because it's all about the pure breed.

Which is the problem with our elites, isn't it? (genetics, that's a whole other blog )

My dogs are well fed. I basically spoil them, and they rule me most of the time. It's up to me to kill the rats. (sigh)

Somebody should talk to those officials about the rat killing instinct. Dogs have either evolved or mine are weird.

And as the saying goes; Properly trained, a man can be dog's best friend. ~Corey Ford

Who Teaches our Teachers?

Nobody Knows who is teaching our teachers...because by the latest pictures coming out of Wisconsin, these people are seriously defective in simple math. What don't they get about the government going broke? What do they NOT comprehend about where their salaries come from?

Do they even THINK?

For God's sake...who is teaching our teachers? They should all be fired. Every one of them.

I don't know about you, but for every good teacher I have met, I could match them with at least fifty that were so ignorant, I wanted to send them back to grade school. They get the smart kids in class (usually the kids whose parents are teaching them at home out of necessity ) to do their work for them. The smart kids teach the other kids how to do the problems, while the teacher is sitting at their desk, engrossed in something else that will benefit HER...like homework for her next degree.

I've seen it a dozen times.

While the teachers all complain "the parents just don't care," I beg to differ. Getting into your local school to see what is going on is like trying to get into Fort Knox. They don't WANT you to see what is going on in their schools. Notice I said "theirs" because that's how every teacher and principal looks at schools. Parents, to them, are inferior beings to be tolerated only on parent/teacher day.

And what is even more insidious, the teachers play a duel role in big brother spying. They make the kids write about their parents and their home life...and if you request to see your child's "diary" you cannot. You, dear parent, YOU are not allowed to see what "emotional" problems your child might be having.

And yet, you pay their salary.

They get medical, pensions, wonderful summer vacations, trips to foreign lands...I mean...these people are spoiled. If they were doing a good job, we could say they deserve it. But they're not.
I've seen teachers working on their "degrees" with computers supplied to them by the TAXPAYERS...while the kids struggle in front of them, alone.

I once talked to a teacher who would not take five minutes out of his day to answer a question from a student (my son). The course was advanced Algebra III, and he said, "I learned by the book. It should be good enough for them. " He stood in the room..he might as well have a lamppost. He refused to "teach."

I thought it was this side of obscenity that this teacher didn't teach, and you know what? the principle stood up for him.

And then you have the grossly overpaid superintendents, and the vast office workers...most of them...worthless from what I've seen. We don't just have a nation of uneducated kids. We have

a nation of uneducated teachers. The blind leading the blind.

Scott Walker, the governor of Wisconsin that is trying to manage the great Union uprising, the only adult in the room, has stood strong. But, like little children the Democrats left the state so as not to have to vote---sulking like little children.

Those Democrats should be fined for every hour they are away...I'd start with $50,00O a day.

The unions killed our manufacturing base, now they are killing our children's future, and all they want is their money.

Here's what we should do. Get rid of the Educational Department, and hand over all our public schools to Bill Gates. No unions allowed.

Let the kids learn from the computers. Only hire teachers who want to "teach." No union allowed, and no tenure. Let the teachers pay for their own education.

Teachers, like our politicians, should start accounting to "we the people."

After all, it's the taxpayer who pays their salaries.

It's about time we remind them.

Lara Login: Alive by the Grace of God

Nobody Wins: The rape and violent beating of Lara Logon, CBS's Chief Foreign Affairs reporter in Cairo this week, was appalling. Everyone agreed how brave she is...how talented she was...

Sorry, I'm going to go a bit further. For all her courage, the woman was just downright stupid. The whole point in life, no matter what job you have: is not to get yourself killed.

I have long blond hair, and every Muslim man that I run into here in my neighborhood gives me a look as if they would like to do to me JUST what happened to her. The hatred oozes, out of them. I give it right back to them, but deep down inside, I feel it's still my country, so they can just go jump on a camel.

BUT...I wouldn't do that in Egypt. Where was HER boss? Really...what WAS she thinking? She could charm them with her good looks? Couldn't she have sent out a Muslim looking man reporter? Or given updates from the balcony of her hotel like the CNN reporters? Is CBS so hard up for viewers that they have to send out the good-looking blond?

Since Lara has worked in Afghanistan, surely she knows how Muslim men feel about blonds. But...I guess when you are being protected by the great American soldier...you start to thinking nothing will happen to YOU personally. Evidently, Lara and her crew had been out in the crowd before this incident. and felt safe. But was it nighttime? Daytime?

You could say she didn't expect it...but Lara knew that Anderson Cooper had been beaten up...and two of Fox's male reporters barely got out with their lives. Also, Lara and her crew were arrested by the Egyptian army and some of her crew members were beaten, before this horrible event.

But--- the story of the great uprising of the Egyptian democratic and peaceful demonstrations MUST be presented to the world, so out she went. The more reports on T.V. about the joy and glory of it all, was just too important for the liberals, and she felt it was her job.

What's the saddest part of this...is that it's just another story. If this had happened in our parents generation, a President would have condemned the action of the whole nation...sternly, and with threats. Everyone in the media, kept the story on her bravery...and IGNORED the fact that the Muslims...hate American, Jews, women, (especially blonds) and they are NOT our friends.

After all, the attack was not one or two...but 200. So they act like it was just a mob rule sort of thing, and had NOTHING to do with the average Muslim.

Right...and Nancy Pelosi has never done Botox, and hates chocolate covered strawberries.

Liberalism, laced with the idea that a woman can do anything a man can, almost killed her.

Obama called her up it is reported ...to say what? Sorry, they hate the Jews not Americans? Don't take it personal? Muslims are good people, as is the fabulous Islamic religion?

The Muslims cried "Jew, Jew" as they beat her. They knew she wasn't Jewish...they're just gutless, spineless, despicable snakes.

Nobody Wins when we ignore the facts of Islam. Obama, and his liberal media could get us all killed. And in his next move at the UN...he will stand against Israel.

You know, Bill O' Reilly 's feeling is that we must act respectful of the man in office...out of respect for the Office. This nobody thinks that because we respect the office, this is the time we must stand up for it, and attack Obama at every turn with reality.

We might not be as lucky as Lara f we don't start calling out Obama soon.

She's still alive thank goodness...and it's by the grace of God.

Allah could have cared less.

What Budget?

Video of the Day: The Deficit Explained — with Whiskey

Nobody Knows: Yesterday, Obama flew all the way to Ohio to give his speech on his "budget." I guess nobody watched it, because TODAY he gave the exact same speech at a press conference at the White House, and EVERYBODY watched it. He could have saved us a few big bucks right there, but...those kids in Ohio needed to feel his concern.

Important state, that Ohio. I wonder why?

I actually listened to his speech...and Nobody Knows that after listening to his budget, this nobody could not tell for the life of me, what the heck he said. (And neither did those school kids) Just when I thought he just couldn't get enough of himself, he organized a big "I WILL NOW GIVE OUT METALS TO WHOM I THINK MOST WORTHY" party.

As if to say: Well, since I broke my promise about cutting the deficit in half, and because I said wouldn't kick the ball down the road and I'm actually launching it to the next seventeen generations..I will show you what I CAN do...bestow Presidential favors.

You must forgive me. Listening to 5 straight hours of Obama talking while I was vacuuming dog hair off the bed, and the floor, and the tables, did not give me a clear understanding of just what he was saying ---I keep getting the dog hair and the speech mixed up...but here's a short summary:

OBAMA: "My budget will keep us by the year, 2021, from spending more money. Then, it will come due. With this budget I will keep us even Steven until that year, in which, all the debt we didn't pay will all be piled on at once. I am a community organizer and I hate to cut community organizer spending, but I also think we cannot cut heating for the poor. And while this budget does not get all things going...simply because, as you know, in a Democracy we have a much harder time than other countries getting things done (which is not MY fault) because we have many voices to hear...and by the way, I prefer the latter (?) You people must realize we have to be pragmatic. These things take time...look at Egypt...you thought three weeks was a long time? It will take at least a month to get King Tut into the Oval Office.

And as you know, George W. Bush without a shot, took down the Berlin Wall. (?) And Warren Buffet, besides being the richest guy in the World, gives half of his money away, great guy...And look how tall that basketball player is! And the great German Leader Merkel got a medal, but I will have to give it to her myself. And here's the greatest union organizer of all...the man, the great, Sweeny.

I love to do this folks! Just look what the unions have done for America. So...let's forget protocol and applaud at this momentous day of budget talks, old X-Presidents who want go up to the Presidential podium (I stopped that) and the reality that I will leave it up to the Republicans to make those old decrepit people work till they are eighty . After they hear how hard they will have to work, they will WANT my health care plan. Understand...it just takes time. "

The rest of the day, everybody and their other buddy were telling us that basically, the President was on crack. (in a metaphorical way..although, until we have drug tests for politicians we don't know for sure) The average American keeps hearing "trillions" and "billions", and we're broke, and etc.. and we each owe $12,000, and maybe we can kick the can, or the horse, or if we get lucky, the IRS agent and Barney Frank from our nursing home in the sky.

I can't believe I made it through Stan Musial not passing out on the floor of the White House.

Paul Ryan said he "punted." Frankly, I don't even think Obama is on the field. He's somewhere riding his camel to Cairo...all by himself.

Nobody Flashes: Germany just took over the New York Stock Exchange. No wonder Merkel got a medal.

Nobody Flashes: France wants to get rid of the dollar.

Nobody Flashes AGAIN: We are so in debt, that Colorado is taxing bull semen, Nevada is going to tax prostitution, and Texas is going to put $100 surcharge on SUV's. Which means it would be unadvisable to drive your SUV out of Texas, dragging your bulls behind, to the brothels in Nevada...unless you're a politician.

So, join me in a more simply explanation about our money problems.

This video is a simple way to explain it all, and you don't even have to go to Ohio to see it.

Spitting on Tiger Woods

Nobody's Perfect: Tiger Woods--- the man who every true golfer wished they could reincarnate into, used to be the closest thing to THE golf god of all golf gods. Tiger was held up on the highest pedestal ever built in the record halls of sports history, remember? I must admit, that I was so sick of all the idol worship that the media poured out like pools of giant whipped cream, even I wanted to see him fail.


Nobody is THAT perfect I told myself. And I was right.

Tiger was dealt another low blow this week.


As If being a all-around lying, manipulating, and low-down sack of golf-club-plugs to his wife and two kids by messing around every other night wasn't enough... it seems, once off the pedestal of perfection, you are full game for the world.

What goes up....must come down.


The European Tour in Dubai just fined Tiger for (I can't believe I'm saying this) for spitting.
On the holiest of holy places...the green.

Good thing he didn't kiss the ball, he might have been arrested.


It was said: "somebody now has to come behind him and maybe putt over his spit. It does not get much lower than that."

Oh...that's low. Tell me, how long does spit stay on the top of grass? How long before it evaporates? What are the odds that other golfers are going to hit it? And how can spit actually effect the trajectory of a golf ball traveling as fast as it does...and as we all know, there are other factors to consider...what about bird droppings?

Where's the scientific proof that Tiger's can beat his fellow golfers with a mere hunk of a spit wad?

Come on. You can't be serious. How many times have we seen baseball players spit on the bat, the glove, the first baseman, the plate, the ball, the umpire...and we DON'T want to know what else.


On the other hand...golf is a rich man's game, and there are rules. The elite and rich, do not look kindly on one of theirs acting like Larry the Cable Guy, even if he is driving a Mercedes.

This little spit fine is probably nothing to Tiger. What's IS going to hurt him much more, is the cancelling of the "future" golf course in Dubai, designed by him. That was cancelled. because, Tiger is no longer number one.

Tiger's brand has been tarnished. Tiger is becoming the Charlie Sheen of the sports world.

The Americans will forgive him. After all, he was the best. But, when it comes to the big money in Dubai? The Arabs (and all of those who have been just waiting to see him fall) are out to get him.


Tiger is going to have to add another bad habit to his sex addiction problem to solve.

Spitting.


You go Tiger...you can do it.

Federalizing Stock Porforlios-or-The Big Fed Fish Stink

Nobody's Opinion:

Ron Paul won the CPAC vote for most favorite man to represent the conservative people last week. And in this Nobody's Opinion, the most important fight that Ron brings to the table is---getting rid of the Federal Reserve.

Ron has been a lone voice in Congress against the Federal Reserve for quite a few years now, and finally the American public is starting to wake up.

The Federal Reserve seems to control all our lives. in its secretive "trickle down" way. Remember Bill Clinton fawning all over Alan Greenspan year after year? Many of us really didn't get it at the time-- at least those of us who suffer from the great America educational experience, where the government is all good, our Founders were wicked men, and Martin Luther King was way greater than George Washington---and you can go ahead and eat the banana AFTER you take the condom off. (Sorry, info brain overload)

But now we do get it. Wall Street, with the help of the Federal Reserve, just downsized us, and then supersized themselves, with the help of Bush and Obama, and that gentle man, Federal Reserve Chairman, Ben Bernanke.

It's hard to keep up with all the corrupt and secrets deals conducted behind closed door, but today I happened upon something I didn't know about.

Let me introduce you to the Depositary Trust & Clearing Corporation. They are a privately owned depository bank for institutional and brokerage firms only. The Federal Reserve handles all the DTCC transactions. In other words, it is owned by the same stockholders as the Federal Reserve System. It's just a front for them. The FED mandates that the DTCC process every securities transaction in the US.

Here's how it works according to Zen Gardner:

In the old days, when you owned stocks you would have the stock certificates lying in your safe. And if you needed to trade them, you needed to get them shipped off to a broker. Nowadays that would be considered very cumbersome, and it would be impractical to invest via computer or over the phone. So the shortcut was invented that the broker would hold your stocks instead of you. And in order for him to legally be able to trade them for you, the stocks were placed under their "street name". I.e. they're in the name of the brokerage, but they're just holding them in trust and trading them for you. And you're in reality the beneficiary rather than the owner.

Which is all fine and dandy if everything goes right. Now, it appears the rules were then changed so the brokers are not allowed any longer to put the stocks in their own name. Instead, what they typically do is to put the stocks into the name of "Cede and Company" or "Cede & Co" or some such variation. And the broker might tell you that it is just a fictitious name, and will explain why it is really more practical to do that than to put it in your name.

The problem with that is that it appears that Cede isn't just some dummy name, but an actual corporation that DTCC controls. And, well, if you ask anybody about this, who actually knows about it, they will naturally tell you that it is all a formality. To serve you better, of course. And, well, maybe it is. DTCC seems like a nice and friendly company. It is a private company, owned by the same people (major U.S. banks) who own the Federal Reserve Bank. And if they all stick to their job, and just keep the money and your stocks flowing smoothly, I'm sure that is all well and good. But if somebody at some point should decide otherwise, and there's a national U.S. emergency and/or the U.S. government becomes unable to pay its debts, well, they might just not give you your stocks back. Because legally they own them.

Guess what? The DTCC holds assets of 23 trillion dollars, and it had 917 trillion dollars worth of transactions in the year 2002...I wonder what it was in 2010, don't you?

To sum it up, they process the vast majority of all stock transactions in the U.S. and many other countries...and 99% of all stocks in the U.S. appears to be legally owned by them.

And shouldn't we, the citizens of the United States, at least KNOW who owns stock in the Federal Reserve Bank? And see the books? Is this any worse than Al Capone books?

Ron Paul once said, "There is something fishy about the head of the world's most powerful government bureaucracy, one that is involved in a full-time counterfeiting operation to sustain monopolistic financial cartels, and the world's most powerful central planner, who set the price of money worldwide, proclaiming the glories of capitalism. "

This Nobody agrees....the Federal Reserve and all its stockholders make Al Capone look like a tiny minnow in Lake Michigan.

It's time we elect more people in Congress to help out Ron Paul.